Protection of Ipr in the Technological Age

By /

Author(s): Susan. P & Antony Vishal

Paper Details: Volume 2, Issue 4

Citation: IJLSSS 2(4) 23

Page No: 238 – 255

Download Paper

ABSTRACT


In the technological age, the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has become increasingly complex and critical. With rapid advancements in digital technologies, the global exchange of information has expanded, making it easier for intellectual property (IP) to be created, distributed, and, unfortunately, infringed upon. IPR, which includes patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, is essential for promoting innovation, creativity, and economic growth. However, the rise of the internet, software development, and emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and 3D printing has significantly challenged traditional IPR frameworks. The digital environment has led to an increase in copyright piracy, patent infringements, and the unlawful distribution of proprietary information. Cyber piracy, unauthorized software copying, and counterfeiting of products have become widespread. Furthermore, as technology evolves, IP laws struggle to keep pace with these advancements, leading to complex legal disputes, particularly in sectors such as software, biotechnology, and entertainment. To address these challenges, governments and international organizations such as the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) have developed initiatives to enhance global cooperation on IPR protection. Additionally, technological tools like Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems and blockchain solutions are being leveraged to safeguard IP in digital spaces. Despite these efforts, a balance must be struck between protecting IP and fostering innovation. Overly restrictive IPR enforcement can stifle creativity, especially in tech startups and open-source communities. As we move forward, it is essential that IPR laws evolve in tandem with technological innovations to ensure the sustainable development of the digital economy while safeguarding creators’ rights.

Keywords: Intellectual Property Right (IPR), Digital Rights Management (DRM), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Blockchain Technology, Patent Law, Fair Use, International Cooperation.


INTRODUCTION

The technological age has brought about transformative changes in almost every sector of society, from communication and commerce to education and healthcare. Innovations in information technology, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and digital media have revolutionized how we live, work, and interact. At the core of these advancements lies the critical issue of intellectual property rights (IPR), which play a fundamental role in fostering creativity, innovation, and economic growth. Intellectual property (IP) refers to the creations of the mind, including inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, and names used in commerce. The protection of these rights is vital for ensuring that innovators and creators receive recognition and financial benefits for their work, thereby encouraging further innovation. In the context of the technological age, IPR has become more significant but also more challenging to manage. The digital era has enabled the rapid creation, dissemination, and replication of information and content, making it easier for intellectual property to be misused or infringed upon. The internet, for instance, allows for the instant sharing of copyrighted materials, patents, and trade secrets across borders, often without the knowledge or consent of the original creators . This ease of duplication and distribution has heightened the need for robust IP protection mechanisms that can adapt to the fast-paced and interconnected nature of the modern technological landscape. The traditional frameworks for intellectual property protection—such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets—were primarily developed in an industrial age where tangible products and physical assets were more prevalent.


However, as we shift to a knowledge-based economy where intangible assets such as software, algorithms, and digital content are increasingly valuable, these traditional systems face new challenges. For example, the software industry, which generates billions of dollars annually, often struggles with issues of piracy and unauthorized use. Similarly, digital media such as music and films are prone to widespread copyright infringement through illegal downloads and streaming services. These issues underscore the need for updated legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms that can keep pace with the evolving technological environment. Another key challenge in the protection of IPR in the technological age is the global nature of innovation and commerce. Intellectual property is no longer confined to national boundaries; it operates in a global marketplace.

This raises questions about how to harmonize IP laws across different jurisdictions to ensure consistent protection for creators and innovators. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and agreements like the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) have attempted to address these issues by promoting international standards for IP protection. However, differences in national laws, enforcement capabilities, and cultural attitudes towards IP still pose significant obstacles. Furthermore, the emergence of new technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and 3D printing has introduced additional complexities to the protection of intellectual property. Blockchain technology, for example, offers the potential to enhance IP management through decentralized and transparent systems, but it also raises concerns about privacy and control.

AI, on the other hand, challenges traditional notions of authorship and inventorship as machines are increasingly capable of creating original works and inventions. These developments necessitate a rethinking of existing IP laws to address the unique challenges posed by these technologies. In conclusion, the protection of intellectual property rights in the technological age is both more critical and more complicated than ever before. As the world becomes increasingly digital and interconnected, ensuring that creators and innovators are adequately protected is essential for promoting further advancements. This paper seeks to explore the evolving challenges of IP protection in the digital era, examine current legal frameworks, and propose potential solutions for safeguarding intellectual assets in the face of technological change.


IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT ON IPR


The debate on intellectual property rights (IPR) in developing countries has shifted over time. After World War II, a new focus emerged on the importance of technology in trade and development, driven by United Nations programs and economists from developing nations. Their analyses highlighted the challenges of technology transfer between developed and developing countries. As time progressed, the nature of these debates evolved, particularly in developing countries where stronger enforcement of intellectual property rights gained importance. This was largely due to the commercialization of imported goods such as software, video, films, and music, which are easier to copy than traditional industrial products.

Copyright protection became a central issue in these regions . Several global changes in the intellectual property regime have influenced how scientific and technological research is conducted in developing countries. Notably, the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1994 resulted in the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs ). This established specific conditions for access to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and introduced new rules for intellectual property protection, affecting developing countries significantly. Intellectual property issues were a major focus during the Uruguay Round. The term “trade-related” was used to link intellectual property matters to potential trade sanctions, allowing countries to negotiate concessions in IPR in exchange for benefits in trade. This approach had a double effect: it strengthened intellectual property rights benefiting industrialized countries while also offering some trade compensations to developing countries.

One of the most significant impacts of TRIPs on developing countries has been in the pharmaceutical sector. Prior to TRIPs, many developing countries either did not grant patents for pharmaceutical products or only patented manufacturing processes. The TRIPs agreement reversed this trend, leading most developing countries to adopt pharmaceutical patents. This shift has had a profound effect on access to medicines and the cost of drugs in these regions. International scientific collaboration has also been influenced by stronger IPR protection. Research suggests that countries need to reach a certain level of scientific activity to trigger growth in patenting and innovation. However, developing countries often face challenges due to the increasing costs of research tools and databases, which limits access to essential information and materials for scientific progress. In the field of biodiversity, multinational pharmaceutical companies have shown interest in molecules found in plants used in traditional medicine in tropical forests. Some countries signed contracts with these companies to share access to biodiversity, although many details remain confidential.

Similarly, traditional knowledge held by ethnic groups, especially in agriculture and medicine, has been commercialized by companies, leading to legal disputes and conflicts over ownership. The relationship between IPR and development in developing countries is complex. Theoretical models have helped explain the impact of stronger IPR protection, but future research should consider the unique challenges faced by developing countries, including local networks and external factors . These dimensions are crucial for understanding the broader effects of intellectual property policies on economic development in these regions.


CHALLENGES TO IPR IN THE DIGITAL ERA

Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) are legal mechanisms that provide creators and innovators exclusive rights over their works for a limited time. These rights, granted over inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, and names used in commerce, are vital for protecting and incentivizing creativity and innovation. Historically, artists and writers created primarily for recognition rather than financial gain, and the need for formal IPRs was minimal.

However, with the invention of the printing press enabling the mass reproduction of books, the importance of protecting intellectual property became clear. IPRs are crucial for developing countries as they support socioeconomic, technological, and cultural advancement. The rights help creators protect their inventions from unauthorized use, ensure originality, and prevent unfair trade practices. These protections also promote continued innovation, contributing to research and development efforts. IPRs encompass various components, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Patents grant inventors the right to exclude others from using their invention for a set period, while trademarks protect symbols, designs, or expressions that distinguish goods.

Copyrights provide creators exclusive rights to their literary, artistic, and musical works among other forms of expression, ensuring they can control reproduction, performance, and distribution. Trade secrets, on the other hand, protect confidential business information like formulas and processes. The protection of IPRs provides economic benefits by encouraging investment in research and innovation. For example, in the pharmaceutical sector, patents allow companies to recoup the costs of developing new drugs. Furthermore, copyright laws help authors, artists, and musicians benefit financially from their creations, incentivizing the production of more intellectual works.

Despite their importance, IPRs must balance the interests of creators and the public. While IPRs grant temporary monopolies, works eventually enter the public domain, allowing free access and use by the public. For instance, copyright law traditionally protected only the reproduction of books but has since expanded to cover other creative works like music, films, and computer programs. However, in the digital age, where information is easily copied and shared, copyright laws are under pressure to adapt to new technological realities. The challenges of enforcing IPRs in a digital environment have led to widespread copyright violations, including hacking, data manipulation, and unauthorized sharing. This has spurred the need for reforms, particularly in digital copyright laws. Librarians, for example, face difficulties in balancing access to information with the risk of infringing on copyright.

Copyright laws must evolve to accommodate digital libraries, electronic copies, and the increased use of multimedia products. To safeguard IPRs in the digital era, laws need modernization. Fair use guidelines should be introduced, and exceptions made for noncommercial infringement. Public awareness and orientation programs can also help users understand the responsible use of e-resources. Ultimately, IPR laws should support the free flow of information while ensuring creators are justly compensated for their contributions.

IPR IN SOFTWARE AND IT INDUSTRIES

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) play a crucial role in the software and IT industries, where innovation and creativity drive progress. Software and IT products, unlike physical goods, are intangible and easily replicable, making robust protection mechanisms essential to ensure creators and companies retain control over their intellectual creations. The primary IPR mechanisms in these industries include copyright, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets.

COPYRIGHT IN SOFTWARE

Copyright is one of the most common protections for software. It safeguards the source code, object code, and related materials like documentation. Under copyright law, software developers hold exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and modify their work. This protection ensures that no one can copy or distribute the software without permission, providing a legal framework to combat piracy. However, copyright protects only the expression of the idea (the code) and not the underlying idea or algorithm, which limits its scope in preventing functional copying.

PATENTS IN SOFTWARE

Patent protection is more challenging but also more powerful in the software industry. A software related invention can be patented if it meets the requirements of novelty, non-obviousness, and utility. Patents offer broader protection than copyrights as they cover the functionality and process, not just the written code. Software patents prevent others from making, using, or selling an invention for a certain period, which can be critical for companies relying on unique algorithms or technical solutions. However, patenting software is a contentious issue as critics argue that it stifles innovation by creating monopolies over basic programming techniques and business methods.

TRADEMARKS IN SOFTWARE AND IT

Trademarks protect brand identity, including logos, names, and symbols associated with a software product or IT service. In a highly competitive industry, a recognizable trademark is vital for differentiating a product in the marketplace. Well known trademarks like Microsoft’s Windows or Apple’s macOS help consumers identify the source and quality of the software, offering legal protection against counterfeit products and brand dilution .

TRADE SECRETS IN SOFTWARE

Many software companies rely on trade secret protection for proprietary algorithms, business methods, or processes that give them a competitive edge. Trade secrets protect confidential information from being disclosed or used by competitors. Unlike patents, trade secrets do not require public disclosure, allowing companies to keep sensitive information private for an indefinite period as long as it remains confidential. This is particularly important in industries where rapid technological changes make patenting less practical.

OPEN SOURCE AND LICENSING

In the software industry, licensing models play a significant role. Opensource software, where the source code is freely available for use, modification, and distribution, represents an alternative approach to traditional IPR. While opensource encourages collaboration and innovation, it also requires specific licensing terms (e.g., GPL, MIT licenses) to govern the use and modification of the software. Licensing agreements, whether opensource or proprietary, are vital to ensuring that users comply with the terms set by the software creator.

CHALLENGES OF IPR IN SOFTWARE

The fast-evolving nature of software and IT poses unique challenges to IPR. Rapid technological advancements mean that patent protection, which can take years to secure, may become obsolete by the time it is granted. Additionally, the global nature of the software market complicates enforcement, as different jurisdictions have varying standards for what constitutes patentable software or fair use of copyrighted materials. The rise of cloud computing, AI, and big data has also introduced complexities in defining and protecting intellectual property in these areas.

IPR ENFORCEMENT AND SOFTWARE PIRACY

Software piracy remains a significant issue in the IT industry. Unauthorized copying, distribution, and use of software products lead to substantial financial losses for companies. IPR enforcement mechanisms, such as Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems, watermarking, and legal actions against infringers, are widely used to mitigate piracy. However, as technology advances, so do methods of circumventing these protections, necessitating continuous updates to enforcement strategies.

IPR AND INNOVATION IN THE IT INDUSTRY

IPR protection fosters innovation in the software industry by ensuring that creators and companies are rewarded for their work. Startups and tech giants alike rely on their intellectual property portfolios to secure funding, attract investors, and maintain competitive advantages. IPR also encourages research and development, as companies are more likely to invest in new technologies if they can protect and monetize their innovations.

TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR PROTECTING IPR

Technological tools for protecting Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are crucial in preventing infringement and ensuring creators maintain control over their innovations and creations. Below are some key technological tools and methods used across various industries to protect IPR:

Digital Rights Management (DRM)

  • DRM systems protect digital content (e.g., music, ebooks, videos, and software) by controlling access and usage.
    Adobe DRM: Used for protecting E-books, PDFs, and digital publications by controlling who can access, copy, or share the content.
    Apple Fair Play: A DRM technology that protects digital media purchased through Apple services like iTunes and the App Store.
    Microsoft PlayReady: Used to protect audio and video content distributed over the internet or mobile devices.

Blockchain for Intellectual Property

Blockchain can be used to establish an immutable timestamped record of ownership and IP creation, making it harder for infringers to claim otherwise.

  • IPwe: A block-chain based platform for IP transactions, making it easier for patent owners to register, sell, or license their patents securely.
  • Verisart: Utilizes blockchain to create certified records of art and digital creations, verifying authenticity and ownership of creative works.

Watermarking and Fingerprinting

  • Digital watermarking and fingerprinting are techniques used to embed hidden information (like ownership details) in digital media, which can later be used to track and verify ownership.
    Digimarc: A digital watermarking technology that embeds imperceptible codes into digital images and documents, protecting media from unauthorized use.
    Civolution: Provides content identification and forensic tracking for audiovisual media, ensuring ownership and protecting against unauthorized redistribution.

Plagiarism Detection Software

  • These tools scan content and compare it to vast databases to detect any copied or unauthorized usage.
    Turnitin: A well-known plagiarism detection tool for academic papers used by universities and research institutions to detect unauthorized content use.
    Copyscape: Used for web content, it checks for plagiarism across online sources to ensure originality.

Patent Management Software

  • These tools manage patent portfolios, monitor potential infringements, and simplify the patent filing process.
    PatSnap: A comprehensive patent analytics platform that helps IP owners manage patents, track competitors, and identify potential infringement.
    IPfolio: A cloud-based IP management software designed for managing patent portfolios, trademarks, and other IP assets.

Secure Data Sharing Platforms

For industries where sharing sensitive IP is necessary (like R&D and legal firms), secure platforms help protect IP while sharing.

  • Intralinks: A secure filesharing and collaboration platform used to share sensitive documents, often used during patent filings or IP negotiations.
    Egnyte: A secure filesharing solution providing encrypted storage and access control to sensitive files and documents.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools for IP Monitoring

AI based tools can monitor and analyze potential infringements by scanning online platforms, patent registries, and other content sources.

  • Clear View IP: An AI powered platform that tracks IP usage, identifies infringement risks, and offers insights on patent landscapes.
  • Ambercite: An AI driven IP analytics tool that identifies patent networks and provides insights into patent citations and potential overlaps.

Geographical Indication (GI) Protection Tools

Technologies like geotagging and digital certification help in protecting geographical indications (GIs) of products.

  • Tag It Smart: A smart labeling and tagging solution that integrates digital tracking, protecting GI products from counterfeiting.
    E Certify: A platform for certifying and authenticating GIbased products, ensuring that the origin of the product is verified.

Copyright Management Platforms

For creators of artistic, literary, and musical works, copyright management platforms help secure their work.

  • Creative Commons: Provides a legal framework to share and protect creative work, offering a range of licenses based on the level of protection or sharing the creator desires.
  • Rights line: A cloud-based copyright management solution used to manage licenses, royalties, and copyright ownership for creative works.

IP Infringement Detection Tools

Tools that scan digital content and media to detect possible copyright or trademark infringements.

  • Red Points: A tool that monitors the internet for counterfeits, copyright infringement, and online IP violations.
  • Image Rights: An image tracking tool used by photographers and visual artists to monitor the internet for unauthorized use of their image.

LEGAL FRAMEWORKS FOR IPR PROTECTION IN THE TECHNOLOGICAL AGE

In the Thaler v. Comptroller General of Patents case, the UK Supreme Court ruled that an AI system cannot be recognized as an inventor under the UK’s patent law. Dr. Stephen Thaler had claimed that his AI system, DABUS, had autonomously created inventions and should be listed as the inventor. The Court rejected Thaler’s argument, stating that according to the UK Patents Act 1977, an “inventor” must be a natural person, meaning a human. Since DABUS is not a human, it could not be listed as the inventor, and Dr. Thaler could not claim patent rights based solely on his ownership of the AI system. Thaler’s applications were considered invalid because they failed to meet the legal requirements: they did not identify a natural person as the inventor. The Court emphasized that while minor errors in patent applications can be corrected, the law does not allow for AI to be named as an inventor. The case raised important policy questions about the future of patent law in the AI age. The Court pointed out that if AI generated inventions are to be granted patents, the law will need to be changed. Otherwise, valuable AI generated inventions might go unprotected, leading to secrecy or the loss of innovations that could benefit society.

BALANCING INNOVATION AND IPR IN THE TECH INDUSTRY

CLEAR AND FLEXIBLE PATENT LAWS

Patent laws need to be clear but also flexible enough to adapt to technological advancements. The rapid evolution of technologies such as software and AI often outpaces current laws, creating ambiguity around what can be patented. Laws that are too rigid may prevent valuable innovations from being protected, while overly broad patents can lead to patent trolling, where companies use patents to block competitors rather than to innovate. For example, in Thaler v. Comptroller General of Patents, the courts ruled that AI cannot be listed as an inventor under current patent laws. This case illustrates how existing legal frameworks are not yet aligned with modern tech innovations, raising questions about how to handle inventions created by AI.

ENCOURAGING OPEN INNOVATION

Open innovation, which allows for collaboration across companies and industries, can be encouraged by allowing certain IP to be shared while retaining protection for core innovations. For instance, some companies use opensource licensing to contribute to the tech community while maintaining their own proprietary systems. This strategy promotes wider use and improvement of technologies without fully giving up commercial control.

LIMITING THE SCOPE OF SOFTWARE PATENTS

In many cases, granting patents for software can be problematic as it is often difficult to define where innovation begins and ends in such an abstract and incremental field. Some countries, like the European Union, place limitations on software patents to prevent monopolization of basic algorithms or general programming concepts, thereby allowing more freedom for innovation while still protecting truly novel inventions.

SHORTER PATENT DURATIONS FOR FAST CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES

In industries where technology changes rapidly, long patent durations may inhibit innovation by blocking competitors from building on new ideas. Shorter patent durations or fast-tracking the review process for tech patents could ensure that innovators can benefit from their creations in the short term while allowing the market to evolve and improve upon those innovations more quickly.

LICENSING AND CROSS LICENSING AGREEMENTS

Licensing arrangements can allow companies to use each other’s patented technologies without engaging in costly legal disputes. This is particularly useful in sectors like telecommunications and software development where interoperability and shared standards are critical for innovation.

ADDRESSING PATENT TROLLING

Patent trolling, where entities acquire patents solely to sue innovators without producing anything themselves, is a major issue in the tech industry. Legislative and judicial actions to limit frivolous lawsuits and ensure that patents are used to protect actual inventions rather than block competition can help balance innovation with protection.

CREATING COLLABORATIVE IP FRAMEWORKS

Industrywide collaborations, such as patent pools where companies agree to share their patents under certain conditions, can help balance IP protection with fostering innovation. These frameworks allow participants to use shared technologies, reducing litigation risks and facilitating the development of new products.

FUTURE OF IPR PROTECTION IN AN EVOLVING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND PATENT LAW

One of the biggest questions for IPR is how to handle AI generated inventions. As seen in cases like Thaler v. Comptroller General of Patents, the current legal framework does not recognize AI as an inventor. However, as AI becomes more capable of generating novel ideas without human intervention, it will challenge existing definitions of inventorship.

BLOCKCHAIN FOR IP MANAGEMENT

Blockchain technology has the potential to transform how intellectual property is managed and protected. By creating immutable records of ownership and licensing agreements, blockchain can increase transparency and reduce disputes over IP. Smart contracts built on blockchain platforms can automate royalty payments, enforce licensing terms, and reduce piracy.

IP PROTECTION IN THE AGE OF OPEN SOURCE

The opensource movement, particularly in software, challenges traditional notions of IP protection. While companies contribute to opensource projects, they often maintain proprietary rights over certain technologies. This hybrid model of innovation has sparked debates about how IPR should be structured to encourage collaboration without compromising the rights of inventors.

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PATENT LAW

In fields like biotechnology, where breakthroughs often involve genetic materials or biological processes, IP laws will need to grapple with ethical questions about what can and should be patented.

DATA AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Data is becoming one of the most valuable assets in the digital economy, raising questions about who owns the data and how it can be protected. Traditional IP frameworks do not always cover raw data, but as data driven AI models and big data analytics grow, the need for stronger protections will increase.

QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENCRYPTION


Quantum computing promises to revolutionize fields like cryptography, which underpins much of IP protection in the digital realm. Current encryption methods could be rendered obsolete by quantum computers, necessitating new security protocols for protecting IP, especially in industries reliant on digital distribution.

GLOBALIZATION AND IP HARMONIZATION


The rapid globalization of technology has exposed the inconsistencies in IPR protections across different jurisdictions. Companies operating internationally face difficulties in enforcing their IP rights across borders, leading to calls for more harmonized global IP regulations.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in the technological age is critical to fostering innovation while balancing the rights of creators and public access. With the rapid advancement of technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and big data, traditional IPR frameworks face significant challenges. These technologies blur the lines of ownership and inventorship, raising questions about who owns the data and how it can be protected. Traditional IP frameworks do not always cover raw data, but as data driven AI models and big data analytics grow, the need for stronger protections will increase. As organizations and policymakers navigate this evolving landscape, they must adapt existing IPR laws to accommodate new forms of creation and innovation. Embracing digital tools like blockchain for secure IP management and AI for monitoring infringements can enhance protection mechanisms. Additionally, international cooperation will be essential to harmonize IP laws across borders, ensuring that innovations are adequately protected globally. Ultimately, a forward-thinking approach to IPR will not only safeguard the interests of creators but also promote a vibrant ecosystem of innovation that benefits society as a whole. It is imperative to strike a balance that encourages creativity while preventing the misuse and theft of intellectual property in an increasingly interconnected world.

REFERENCES

  • Yijun Tian & Jane Winn, Rethinking Intellectual Property, in BOOK NAME 12324 (Jane Winn ed., Taylor & Francis 2009).
  • Intellectual Property Office, what is Intellectual Property? (2021),
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whatisintellectualproperty.
  • Claudio Frischtak, Protection of Intellectual Property Rights for Industrial and Technological Development in Brazil, in BOOK NAME 5657 (AUTHOR ed., Taylor & Francis 2009).
  • Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), Apr. 15, 1994, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994).
  • David Lange, The Special Place of the Written Word: The Effect of the Constitution on Copyright Law, 55 Ohio State Law Journal 553, 556 (1994).
  • World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO Overview of the TRIPS Agreement (2020), https://www.wipo.int/aboutip/en/.
  • WTO Trade and Environment, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd202_1_e.pdf.
  • Melissa Mossberger, Daniel A. Schiller & Adrian Kennickell, The Role of Digital Platforms in Strengthening Social Capital and Civic Engagement, 85 Ann. Rev. Soc. 341 (2019).
  • Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents (2002).
  • U.S. Copyright Office, Circular 1: Copyright Basics (2021), https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf.
  • World Bank, World Development Report 2021: Data for Better Lives (2021), https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2021.
  • Jayashree Watal, The WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (2001).
  • Patricia S. Fennell, Copyright for Librarians (2020).
  • David T. E. Lee, Software Patents: An Overview (2019).
  • David P. Reed, The Data Revolution: Big Data and the Future of Intellectual Property Law (2016).
  • Richard Stallman, The GNU Manifesto (1985).
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association, 2019 Report of the Economic Survey (2019).
  • Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (UK).
  • U.S. Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.
  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq.
  • The Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 1954.
  • The Madrid Protocol: International Trademark Registration (2020).
  • Yijun Tian, The Global Intellectual Property Architecture: A New Perspective (2020).
  • European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, 2019/790 (EU).
  • Thaler v. Comptroller General of Patents, [2021] UKSC 8 (UK).
  • Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1979.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO Report on Copyright and Related Rights (2020), https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4516.
  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: 2016 Update (2016), https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/IPandtheUSEconomy2016.pdf.
  • European Union, Directive 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (2019), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L0790.
Scroll to Top